Thesis Defense Seminar - Devin Comba

MARINE BIOLOGY PROGRAM
DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-CORPUS CHRISTI

SUBJECT: Evaluating biodegradable alternatives to plastic mesh for use in small-scale oyster reef restorations

MAJOR ADVISOR: Dr. Jennifer Beseres Pollack

ABSTRACT

Oyster reefs have been in decline due to disease, overharvest, and habitat loss. In turn, the ecological and economic benefits of the reefs are threatened, and there are efforts to restore what has been lost. Small-scale and community-based restoration activities traditionally use plastic mesh bags filled with recycled oyster shell to form a three-dimensional substrate for new oyster recruitment. However, plastic pollution is a well-understood concern, and there is a need to develop new restoration approaches that decrease the introduction of plastics to the marine environment. The goal of this study was to evaluate the functionality of biodegradable mesh alternatives for use in small-scale oyster reef restoration efforts. Experimental reefs were constructed in shallow (1 m) areas using recycled oyster shells placed into four different mesh bag types: the traditional polyethylene plastic mesh and three biodegradable alternatives (cellulose, cotton, and jute). Reefs were monitored for seven months to assess the ecological community and condition of the bag material. Cellulose, cotton, and jute bags fully degraded within two months of deployment, while plastic bags remained intact. Oyster and fauna recruitment were greatest in plastic bags, and we suspect that the persistence of structure influenced this result. Rapid degradation of the materials in the field was further investigated in laboratory-based experiments, which suggested that herbivorous grazing played a large role in degradation. Plastic bags resulted in the greatest benefit-cost ratios, though accurate valuation of environmental and societal costs is spotty. Cotton was the most cost-effective biodegradable alternative, but recruitment of oysters and fauna to biodegradable treatments cannot be attributed to structured bags, rather, to loose shell post-degradation. The results of this study highlight the need for developing cost-effective, environmentally-friendly materials not only for daily consumer use, but also for sustainable habitat restoration.

JOIN ONLINE:
https://tamucc.zoom.us/j/91773596863?pwd=K0ZlMW5Ca0ZneUxiRXhFK1QrTFVxQT09

Meeting ID: 917 7359 6863
Passcode: 199360

One tap mobile
+13462487799,,91773596863#,,,,*199360# US (Houston)
+16699006833,,91773596863#,,,,*199360# US (San Jose)

Dial by your location
+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)
+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)
+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)
+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)
+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)
+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)
833 548 0282 US Toll-free
877 853 5257 US Toll-free
888 475 4499 US Toll-free
833 548 0276 US Toll-free

Meeting ID: 917 7359 6863
Passcode: 199360